MagicBot Z1 vs TORO
Side-by-side comparison of MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) and TORO (DLR) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MagicBot Z1CN
TORODE
Year First Available
- MagicBot Z1—
- TORO2013
Verified Deployments
- MagicBot Z10 Deployments
- TORO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MagicBot Z12 hrs
- TORO1 hrs
Availability Status
- MagicBot Z1ACTIVE
- TOROACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- MagicBot Z1136.9 mm
- TORO—
Mobility Type
- MagicBot Z1bipedal
- TORO—
Humanoid Subtype
- MagicBot Z1full bipedal
- TORO—
Terrain
- MagicBot Z1flat_indoor
- TORO—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- MagicBot Z12 kg
- TORO—
Payload (Peak)
- MagicBot Z13 kg
- TORO—
Total DOF
- MagicBot Z124
- TORO—
Arm DOF
- MagicBot Z15
- TORO—
Arm Reach
- MagicBot Z150 cm
- TORO—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- MagicBot Z18-core high-performance CPU
- TORO—
Compute Platform
- MagicBot Z18-core high-performance CPU
- TORO—
VLM Capable
- MagicBot Z1onboard small
- TORO—
Imitation Learning
- MagicBot Z1multi task
- TORO—
Teleoperation
- MagicBot Z1joystick
- TORO—
Programming
- MagicBot Z1code_python, teleoperation
- TORO—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- MagicBot Z12 hrs
- TORO—
Charging Method
- MagicBot Z1manual swap
- TORO—
Battery Swap
- MagicBot Z1Yes
- TORO—
Safety
Fall Recovery
- MagicBot Z1Yes
- TORO—
Human Detection Method
- MagicBot Z1multi modal
- TORO—
Software
SDK Languages
- MagicBot Z1code_python, teleoperation
- TORO—
Open API
- MagicBot Z1limited rest
- TORO—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- MagicBot Z1beta pilot
- TORO—
Commercial
Applications
- MagicBot Z1research
- TORO—
| MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | TOROhumanoidDLR 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 136.9 mm | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | — |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 24 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 50 cm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 8-core high-performance CPU | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | 8-core high-performance CPU | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard small | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | — |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | beta pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
MagicBot Z1 vs TORO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.