Mirokai vs QB-ROBOT-72
Side-by-side comparison of Mirokai (Nihon Binary) and QB-ROBOT-72 (Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Mirokai—
- QB-ROBOT-72China
Verified Deployments
- Mirokai0 Deployments
- QB-ROBOT-720 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- MirokaiContact for quote
- QB-ROBOT-72$3,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Mirokai—
- QB-ROBOT-726 hrs
Availability Status
- MirokaiACTIVE
- QB-ROBOT-72ACTIVE
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- Mirokaihybrid
- QB-ROBOT-72lidar slam
Power
Battery Runtime
- Mirokai—
- QB-ROBOT-726 hrs
Integration
Fleet Management
- Mirokaisingle dashboard
- QB-ROBOT-72—
Display & UX
Voice Interaction
- MirokaiYes
- QB-ROBOT-72—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MirokaiContact for quote
- QB-ROBOT-72$3,000
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | hybrid | lidar slam |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Integration | ||
| Fleet Management (values differ) | single dashboard | — |
| Display & UX | ||
| Voice Interaction (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Payload, Robot Weight, Tray Count, Compartment Type, Dimensions, IP Rating, Max Speed, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Auto Docking, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Floor Compatibility, Display Size, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Mirokai and QB-ROBOT-72?
Mirokai is made by Nihon Binary. QB-ROBOT-72 is made by Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do Mirokai and QB-ROBOT-72 compare on the Robolist Product Score?
Mirokai scores 0/100. QB-ROBOT-72 scores 35/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Mirokai and QB-ROBOT-72 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Hospitality Service robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mirokai and QB-ROBOT-72?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
Mirokai vs QB-ROBOT-72 compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.