NAO V5 vs Pibo
Side-by-side comparison of NAO V5 (Aldebaran) and Pibo (Circulus Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 NAO V5humanoidAldebaran—Trust Score |  PibohumanoidCirculus Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2022 | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 574 mm | 250 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 5.4 kg | — |
| Humanoid Subtype | bipedal | bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | — |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 25 | 10 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Intel i7 processor | 1.4Ghz quad-core chip |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research, education | museum interaction |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NAO V5 vs Pibo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.