NEO vs Ribo
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and Ribo (RoboSUST) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
NEOUS
Ribo—
Year First Available
NEO2026
Ribo2017
Verified Deployments
NEO0 Deployments
Ribo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
NEO$20,000
RiboContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
NEO4 hrs
Ribo4 hrs
Availability Status
NEOACTIVE
RiboACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
NEO1676.4 mm
Ribo1290 mm
Weight
NEO29.9 kg
Ribo1.3 kg
Mobility Type
NEObipedal
Ribo—
Humanoid Subtype
NEOservice humanoid
Ribo—
Walking Speed
NEO1.4 m/s
Ribo2 m/s
Terrain
NEOflat_indoor
Riboindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
NEO25 kg
Ribo40 kg
Total DOF
NEO52
Ribo16
Arm DOF
NEO7
Ribo—
Hand DOF
NEO22
Ribo—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Ribo—
Foundation Models
NEO1X World Model
Ribo—
Programming
NEOvoice, mobile app
Ribocode_ros
Battery & Power
Runtime
NEO4 hrs
Ribo4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
NEOvoice, mobile app
Ribocode_ros
ROS Support
NEO—
RiboYes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
NEOprototype
Ribo—
Commercial
Price (USD)
NEO$20,000
RiboContact for quote
Price Tier
NEO<10K
Ribo—
Pricing Model
NEOpurchase
Ribo—
Warranty
NEO3 yrs
Ribo—
Applications
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
Ribocleaning
NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | RibohumanoidRoboSUST46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 1290 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 1.3 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 40 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 16 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | code_ros |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | cleaning |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
NEO vs Ribo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.