NEO vs SIGMO
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and SIGMO (Unknown) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
NEOUSSIGMO—
Year First Available
NEO2026SIGMO2005
Verified Deployments
NEO0 DeploymentsSIGMO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
NEO$20,000SIGMO$199
Battery / Shift Runtime
NEO4 hrsSIGMO—
Availability Status
NEOACTIVESIGMOACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
NEO1676.4 mmSIGMO36 cm
Weight
NEO29.9 kgSIGMO0.5 kg
Mobility Type
NEObipedalSIGMO—
Humanoid Subtype
NEOservice humanoidSIGMO—
Walking Speed
NEO1.4 m/sSIGMO—
Terrain
NEOflat_indoorSIGMOboth
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
NEO25 kgSIGMO—
Total DOF
NEO52SIGMO6
Arm DOF
NEO7SIGMO2
Hand DOF
NEO22SIGMO—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)SIGMOSingle Go binary
Foundation Models
NEO1X World ModelSIGMO—
Programming
NEOvoice, mobile appSIGMO—
Battery & Power
Runtime
NEO4 hrsSIGMO—
Software
SDK Languages
NEOvoice, mobile appSIGMO—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
NEOprototypeSIGMO—
Commercial
Price (USD)
NEO$20,000SIGMO$199
Price Tier
NEO<10KSIGMO200-400K
Pricing Model
NEOpurchaseSIGMO—
Warranty
NEO3 yrsSIGMO—
Applications
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitalitySIGMOeSIM Management, SMS Management, Network Control
NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2005 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $199 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 36 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 0.5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 6 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | Single Go binary |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $199 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 200-400K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | eSIM Management, SMS Management, Network Control |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NEO vs SIGMO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.