NEO vs SIGMO
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and SIGMO (Unknown) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Physical Form Factor
Height
Weight
Mobility Type
Humanoid Subtype
Walking Speed
Terrain
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
Total DOF
Arm DOF
Hand DOF
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
Foundation Models
Programming
Battery & Power
Runtime
Software
SDK Languages
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
Commercial
Price (USD)
Price Tier
Pricing Model
Warranty
Applications
 NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2005 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $199 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 36 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 0.5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 6 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | Single Go binary |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $199 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 200-400K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | eSIM Management, SMS Management, Network Control |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NEO vs SIGMO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.