NEO vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and 天链人形机器人T1 (四川天链机器人股份有限公司) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
NEOUS
天链人形机器人T1CN
Year First Available
- NEO2026
- 天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
- NEO0 Deployments
- 天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- NEO$20,000
- 天链人形机器人T1Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- NEO4 hrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Availability Status
- NEOACTIVE
- 天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- NEO1676.4 mm
- 天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Weight
- NEO29.9 kg
- 天链人形机器人T143 kg
Mobility Type
- NEObipedal
- 天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- NEOservice humanoid
- 天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
- NEO1.4 m/s
- 天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Terrain
- NEOflat_indoor
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- NEO25 kg
- 天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
- NEO—
- 天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
- NEO52
- 天链人形机器人T171
Arm DOF
- NEO7
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Hand DOF
- NEO22
- 天链人形机器人T13
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Foundation Models
- NEO1X World Model
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Programming
- NEOvoice, mobile app
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- NEO4 hrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Software
SDK Languages
- NEOvoice, mobile app
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- NEOprototype
- 天链人形机器人T1prototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- NEO$20,000
- 天链人形机器人T1Contact for quote
Price Tier
- NEO<10K
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Pricing Model
- NEOpurchase
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Warranty
- NEO3 yrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Applications
- NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
- 天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
| NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | 天链人形机器人T1humanoid四川天链机器人股份有限公司 46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 43 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 71 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | 3 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NEO vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.