NEO vs UBTECH Walker S
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and UBTECH Walker S (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
 NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS55.8Trust Score |  UBTECH Walker ShumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available | 2026 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $100,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 1700 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 77 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | 3 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoors |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 41 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | 5 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | ROSA 2.0 |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | code_python, code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 2-5 |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | code_python, code_ros |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $100,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 50-150K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | inspection, assembly, logistics |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
NEO vs UBTECH Walker S compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.