Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and Unitree R1 (Unitree Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
NEOUS
Unitree R1CNYear First Available
NEO2026
Unitree R12026Verified Deployments
NEO0 Deployments
Unitree R10 DeploymentsPrice Range (USD)
NEO$20,000
Unitree R1$4,900Battery / Shift Runtime
NEO4 hrs
Unitree R11 hrsAvailability Status
NEOACTIVE
Unitree R1ACTIVEHeight
NEO1676.4 mm
Unitree R1123 mmWeight
NEO29.9 kg
Unitree R1—Mobility Type
NEObipedal
Unitree R1bipedalHumanoid Subtype
NEOservice humanoid
Unitree R1full bipedalWalking Speed
NEO1.4 m/s
Unitree R1—Terrain
NEOflat_indoor
Unitree R1indoorPayload
NEO25 kg
Unitree R1—Total DOF
NEO52
Unitree R126Arm DOF
NEO7
Unitree R15Hand DOF
NEO22
Unitree R1—Onboard Compute
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Unitree R18-core high-performance CPUCompute Platform
NEO—
Unitree R18-core high-performance CPUFoundation Models
NEO1X World Model
Unitree R1—Programming
NEOvoice, mobile app
Unitree R1—Runtime
NEO4 hrs
Unitree R11 hrsSDK Languages
NEOvoice, mobile app
Unitree R1—Open API
NEO—
Unitree R1YesDeployment Maturity
NEOprototype
Unitree R1—Price (USD)
NEO$20,000
Unitree R1$4,900Price Tier
NEO<10K
Unitree R110-20KPricing Model
NEOpurchase
Unitree R1purchaseWarranty
NEO3 yrs
Unitree R10.5 yrsApplications
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
Unitree R1research, teleoperation NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | Unitree R1humanoidUnitree Robotics—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available | 2026 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $4,900 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 123 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | — |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $4,900 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | 0.5 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | research, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
NEO vs Unitree R1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.