Side-by-side comparison of Optimus (Tesla) and Wanda 2.0 (UniX AI) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Manipulation Repeatability


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Charging Method


Force-Limited Arms


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


IP Rating


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Applications


| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2022 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $25,000 | $85,050 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 173 mm | 170 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 25.4 kg | — |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2.2 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor, uneven outdoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 9 kg | 12 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 68 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 75 | 23 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 28 | 8 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 98.2 cm |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Bimanual Coordination | full bimanual | full bimanual |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | production validated |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Tesla AI5 chip | 275 TOPS |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) computer | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | vr_headset |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | imitation_learning_ui |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2.3 kWh | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | auto dock |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | software_defined |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | imitation_learning_ui |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | No |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP68 FOREARM TO HANDS & FOOT | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $25,000 | $85,050 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | 2 mo | — |
| Applications (values differ) | logistics, healthcare, domestic use | hospitality, household, property_management, security |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Grip Strength, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Optimus is made by Tesla, based in US. Wanda 2.0 is made by UniX AI, based in CN.
Optimus launched in 2022. Wanda 2.0 launched in 2026.
Optimus is listed at $25,000. Wanda 2.0 is listed at $85,050.
Optimus scores 69/100. Wanda 2.0 scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Optimus carries up to 68 kg. Wanda 2.0 carries up to 12 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Optimus vs Wanda 2.0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.