OWL vs Proteus
Side-by-side comparison of OWL (IPLUSMOBOT) and Proteus (Amazon Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- OWLChina
- ProteusUnited States
Year First Available
- OWL—
- Proteus2022
Verified Deployments
- OWL0 Deployments
- Proteus0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- OWLACTIVE
- ProteusACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- OWL5,000 kg
- Proteus22.7 kg
AMR Subtype
- OWLpallet mover
- Proteusunit load carrier
Length
- OWL3,002 mm
- Proteus—
Width
- OWL1,502 mm
- Proteus—
Turning Radius
- OWL0 mm
- Proteus—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- OWLlidar slam
- Proteusslam natural
Localization Accuracy
- OWL10 mm
- Proteus—
Pedestrian Detection
- OWL—
- ProteusYes
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- OWL1.2 m/s
- Proteus—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- OWL1.5 m/s
- Proteus—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- OWL—
- Proteusother
Safety
Safety Category
- OWL—
- ProteusSIL2
Connectivity
API Type
- OWLopen rest
- Proteus—
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- OWLYes
- ProteusYes
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 5,000 kg | 22.7 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | pallet mover | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 3,002 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 1,502 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 0 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | slam natural |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 10 mm | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | other |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | SIL2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt | Yes | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes OWL and Proteus?
OWL is made by IPLUSMOBOT, based in CN. Proteus is made by Amazon Robotics, based in US.
How do OWL and Proteus compare on the Robo Index?
OWL grades BBB on the Robo Index. Proteus grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are OWL and Proteus in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between OWL and Proteus?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
OWL vs Proteus compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.