OZ vs ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester
Side-by-side comparison of OZ (Naïo Technologies SAS) and ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester (FireFly Automatix) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- OZFrance
- ProSlab 165 Turf HarvesterUnited States
Year First Available
- OZ2011
- ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester—
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- OZ$38,360–$43,280 USD
- ProSlab 165 Turf HarvesterContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- OZ8 hrs
- ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester—
Availability Status
- OZACTIVE
- ProSlab 165 Turf HarvesterACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- OZ700 kg
- ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester—
Max Speed
- OZ0.4 m/s
- ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester—
Autonomy Level
- OZfully autonomous
- ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2011 | — |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $38,360–$43,280 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | 700 kg | — |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.4 m/s | — |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | fully autonomous | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Reach, IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | OZ | ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $40,820 | No price |
| Payback period | 9.8 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $209,180 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +512% | — |
ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes OZ and ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester?
OZ is made by Naïo Technologies SAS, based in FR. ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester is made by FireFly Automatix, based in US.
Are OZ and ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agricultural on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between OZ and ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms
10 min readAgricultural Robots
From Research Plot to Commercial Scale: A Two-Season Playbook
9 min readAgricultural Robots
Field Constraints That Kill Robot Deployments: Terrain, Weather, Crop Spacing
9 min readAgricultural Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
OZ vs ProSlab 165 Turf Harvester compares two robots in the agricultural category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.