Petman vs UBTECH Walker S
Side-by-side comparison of Petman (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) and UBTECH Walker S (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 PetmanhumanoidBoston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)60.1Trust Score |  UBTECH Walker ShumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.63.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $100,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 1700 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 79.4 kg | 77 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | anthropomorphic torso | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 3 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | production ready | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured | indoors |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 32 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 50 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 56 | 41 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Custom PC | ROSA 2.0 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperation | code_python, code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2-5 |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | teleoperation | code_python, code_ros |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | water and dustproof | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $100,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 50-150K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | HMGMA | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research | inspection, assembly, logistics |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Compute Platform, Foundation Models, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time
About this comparison
Petman vs UBTECH Walker S compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.