Side-by-side comparison of pib.Pro (pib) and Sanbot Nano (Sanbot Innovation Technology) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Battery Capacity

Human Detection Method

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Open API

IP Rating

Deployment Maturity

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $111 | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 890 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 0.4 kg | 19 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | wheeled humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 0.8 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor, uneven outdoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 75 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 8 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | none |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 10 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.3 kWh |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | ros1 community |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP69K | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $111 | $3,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing, eldercare_assistance, research | home, education, healthcare, public_service |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
pib.Pro is made by pib, based in DE. Sanbot Nano is made by Sanbot Innovation Technology.
pib.Pro launched in 2023. Sanbot Nano launched in 2017.
pib.Pro is listed at $111. Sanbot Nano is listed at $3,000.
pib.Pro scores 48/100. Sanbot Nano scores 56/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
pib.Pro vs Sanbot Nano compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.