Potaro vs T1 Pro
Side-by-side comparison of Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) and T1 Pro (天链机器人) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
PotaroJP
T1 Pro—
Year First Available
- Potaro2023
- T1 Pro—
Verified Deployments
- Potaro0 Deployments
- T1 Pro0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- PotaroACTIVE
- T1 ProACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Potaro1984 mm
- T1 Pro160 mm
Mobility Type
- Potarowheeled
- T1 Probipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Potaroservice humanoid
- T1 Profull bipedal
Walking Speed
- Potaro—
- T1 Pro2.2 m/s
Running Capable
- Potaro—
- T1 Prodynamic walk
Terrain
- Potaroflat_indoor
- T1 Proflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Potaro—
- T1 Pro145 kg
Total DOF
- Potaro—
- T1 Pro71
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- PotaroGeneral server with two GPUs
- T1 Pro—
Battery & Power
Battery Capacity
- Potaro—
- T1 Pro1.3 kWh
Avg Power Consumption
- Potaro1,500 W
- T1 Pro—
Safety
Human Detection Method
- Potarovision human
- T1 Pro—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Potaroproduction pilot
- T1 Proproduction pilot
Commercial
Price Tier
- Potaro—
- T1 Pro未披露
Pricing Model
- Potaro—
- T1 Pro未披露
Production Pilots
- PotaroToyota Memorial Hospital
- T1 Pro—
Applications
- Potarohospitality
- T1 Proeldercare_assistance, retail, entertainment, research
| PotarohumanoidToyota Motor Corporation 27.9Trust Score | T1 Prohumanoid天链机器人 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | JP | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1984 mm | 160 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | dynamic walk |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 145 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 71 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | General server with two GPUs | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1.3 kWh |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | 1,500 W | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | production pilot | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 未披露 |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | 未披露 |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Toyota Memorial Hospital | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality | eldercare_assistance, retail, entertainment, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Weight, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
Potaro vs T1 Pro compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.