Potaro vs Xiaomi CyberOne
Side-by-side comparison of Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) and Xiaomi CyberOne (Xiaomi) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
PotaroJP
Xiaomi CyberOneCN
Year First Available
- Potaro2023
- Xiaomi CyberOne—
Verified Deployments
- Potaro0 Deployments
- Xiaomi CyberOne0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- PotaroACTIVE
- Xiaomi CyberOneACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Potaro1984 mm
- Xiaomi CyberOne177 mm
Mobility Type
- Potarowheeled
- Xiaomi CyberOnebipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Potaroservice humanoid
- Xiaomi CyberOnefull bipedal
Walking Speed
- Potaro—
- Xiaomi CyberOne1 m/s
Terrain
- Potaroflat_indoor
- Xiaomi CyberOneflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- Potaro—
- Xiaomi CyberOne21
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- PotaroGeneral server with two GPUs
- Xiaomi CyberOne—
Battery & Power
Avg Power Consumption
- Potaro1,500 W
- Xiaomi CyberOne—
Safety
Human Detection Method
- Potarovision human
- Xiaomi CyberOnevision human
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Potaroproduction pilot
- Xiaomi CyberOne—
Commercial
Production Pilots
- PotaroToyota Memorial Hospital
- Xiaomi CyberOne—
Applications
- Potarohospitality
- Xiaomi CyberOneeldercare_assistance, hospitality
| PotarohumanoidToyota Motor Corporation 27.9Trust Score | Xiaomi CyberOnehumanoidXiaomi 39.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | JP | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1984 mm | 177 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 21 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | General server with two GPUs | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | 1,500 W | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method | vision human | vision human |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Toyota Memorial Hospital | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality | eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Weight, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
Potaro vs Xiaomi CyberOne compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.