R1 vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision
Side-by-side comparison of R1 (Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia) and Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 R1humanoidIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia46.5Trust Score |  Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionhumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $250,000 | $65,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 3 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 50 kg | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | null | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.6 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1.5 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 20 | 21 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 8 | 4 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | dual-core CPU with external Ethernet interface | 275 TOPS |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, proprietary_app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 3 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, proprietary_app | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $250,000 | $65,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
R1 vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.