Side-by-side comparison of Sanbot Nano (Sanbot Innovation Technology) and Sanbot S1 (Cloraint Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Battery Swap


Human Detection Method


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $3,000 | $11,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 18 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 90.2 mm | 848.32 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 19 kg | 100 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | 5 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | home |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload | 75 kg | 75 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 8 | 27 |
| Arm DOF | 10 | 10 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | 1x2(L/R) DOF |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | Amazon Alexa |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 18 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0.3 kWh | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | none |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros1 community | No |
| Open API (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $3,000 | $11,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Applications (values differ) | home, education, healthcare, public_service | healthcare, education, hospitality, public_service |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Sanbot Nano is made by Sanbot Innovation Technology. Sanbot S1 is made by Cloraint Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Sanbot Nano is listed at $3,000. Sanbot S1 is listed at $11,000.
Sanbot Nano scores 56/100. Sanbot S1 scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Sanbot Nano carries up to 75 kg. Sanbot S1 carries up to 75 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Sanbot Nano vs Sanbot S1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.