Gold · #1
Carbon Robotics
71.66
65.04 score + 6.62 momentum
best robot 62.4 · 3 ranked robots
Agricultural · companies · scores as of 6 Sept 2026 · updated 11 Sep 2026
42 makers, ranked on their agricultural robots alone — not on their size, their funding, or how much of their catalogue we happen to hold. The robot standing ranks the machines themselves.
The top-ranked agricultural company on Robolist.ai is Carbon Robotics, with a RoboIndex of 71.66.
Close behind: ECOVACS at 66.43, then Robomow at 63.56.
Robolist.ai ranks 42 agricultural companies by RoboIndex as of 6 Sep 2026.
Gold · #1
71.66
65.04 score + 6.62 momentum
best robot 62.4 · 3 ranked robots
Silver · #2
66.43
57.99 score + 8.44 momentum
best robot 58.0 · 1 ranked robot
Bronze · #3
63.56
63.56 score
best robot 63.6 · 1 ranked robot
RoboIndex ranks each company on its best eligible robot in this category, plus capped credit for repeating it, plus momentum. Momentum can only add to a rank, never subtract from one.
Carbon Robotics ranks #1 for Agricultural as of 6 Sep 2026, by RoboIndex.
Robolist.ai ranks 42 agricultural companies as of 6 Sep 2026.
A company's RoboIndex is its best-ranked robot's RoboScore — a 0-100 evidence score from structured data — plus a depth credit for additional ranked robots, plus up to 15 Momentum points from dated news, which decay over about 90 days. Momentum can only add to the score, never subtract from it. Full breakdown at /methodology.
Scores freeze once a week; the board shows that weekly standing. This standing is current as of 6 Sep 2026.
A maker is ranked here on its agricultural robots only. Not on its global rating, and not on its size. A company that is strong in one category and weak in another ranks differently on each board — that is the point of having one board per category.
Rank = best robot, plus credit for repeating it, plus news. The evidence part is the maker's best eligible agricultural robot plus up to 5 points once it fields 8 of them. The credit is capped, so a large catalogue cannot buy a rank — catalogue size partly measures how much of a maker we have collected, which is our business, not theirs. Every part is printed above: the RoboScore, the Momentum added to it, and the RoboIndex they sum to — with the best robot named on each of the top three cards.
Deployments and funding are not in this score. Seven in ten companies have no deployment record on file and funding is blank for exactly the makers a buyer trusts most, so ranking on them would rank our own reading rather than the market. Nothing here can be bought, claimed, or subscribed to.
RoboIndex is RoboScore + Momentum. News can raise a rank by up to 15 points and can never lower one, so a maker with live events is ordered above one on the same evidence. Both parts are printed on the row, so a company sitting above a higher score always says why. A quiet maker keeps its full RoboScore: we have not measured silence, only failed to hear anything, and the two are not the same.
How we rank — the evidence behind every robot score these standings are built from.