ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA SURGERY WITH ROSA INSTRUMENTATION, THE PLANNED DISTAL FEMUR CUT WAS 7/9.5MM. THE CUT BONE AND VALIDATED CUT WAS OVER RESECTED AT 10/12.5MM. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA SURGERY WITH ROSA INSTRUMENTATION THE TIBIA WAS OVER-RESECTED BY 2MM MEDIALLY AND 3.5MM LATERALLY. DUE TO THIS DEVIATION FROM THE SURGICAL PLAN, A 16MM TIBIAL IMPLANT WAS NEEDED WHEN A 10MM IMPLANT WAS PLANNED. PATIENT HAD NO IMPACT AND WAS NOT AFFECTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA SURGERY USING ROSA INSTRUMENTATION, THE TIBIA WAS OVER-RESECTED BY 3MM POSTERIOR-LATERAL. THIS WAS VALIDATED USING CALIPERS. TISSUE RELEASES AND BONE RECUTS HAD TO BE MADE TO BALANCE THE KNEE. A THICKER POLY HAD TO BE USED THAN WOULD HAVE BEEN THE CASE IF ROSA HAD CORRECTLY CUT THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF BONE. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INITIAL ROSA INSTRUMENTATION TKA SURGERY BOTH ROSA AND CALIPER VALIDATIONS CONFIRMED THAT THE TIBIA WAS OVER-RESECTED BY 4MM MEDIALLY AND 3MM LATERALLY. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA PROCEDURE WHILE USING ROSA INSTRUMENTATION, THERE WAS AN OVER RESECTION FROM PLANNED TIBIAL CUT OF 6MM. A 16MM INLAY WAS USED AND THE KNEE WAS STABLE AND WELL BALANCED. AS OF THIS REPORT SUBMISSION THERE HAS BEEN NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA UTILIZING ROSA INSTRUMENTATION THE TIBIA WAS OVER RESECTED BOTH MEDIALLY AND LATERALLY 4MM. CALIPERS WERE USED TO VERIFY THAT EXCESSIVE BONE REMOVAL HAD OCCURRED. NO KNOWN IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROSA TKA SURGERY THE 4-IN-1 CUT WAS NOT ACCURATE AND LED TO AN OVER-RESECTION. THE OVER-RESECTION WAS ENOUGH TO NOTCH THE FEMUR. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA SURGERY WITH ROBOTIC INSTRUMENTATION THE SURGEON PLANNED FOR TIBIA 0 DEGREE V/V CUT BUT ENDED UP IN 7 DEGREE VARUS (FROM POST-OP X-RAY). THE ROBOTIC SYSTEM SUGGESTED TIBIA BONE CUT OF 11.5MM ON LATERAL AND 9MM ON MEDIAL. THE VERIFIED CUT WAS 9MM MEDIAL AND 12MM LATERAL. VERIFICATION SHOWED 1 DEGREE OF VALGUS. FROM PRE-OP X-RAY TEMPLATING, SURGEON SHOULD HAVE CUT 12MM ON LATERAL AND 4MM ON MEDIAL TO GET THE KNEE STRAIGHT. NO MID SURGERY INTERVENTION OCCURRED. SURGEON EXECUTED THE SURGERY THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED. NO KNOWN IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A ROBOTIC ASSISTED TKA SURGERY AND THE CUTS PERFORMED ON THE TIBIAL RESECTIONS WERE AROUND 4-4.5 MM OFF (OVERCUT) FROM PLANNED RESECTION VALUES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A LARGER POLY (14MM) THAN PLANNED (10MM) WITH NO KNOWN REPORTED IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. PATIENT WAS PAIN FREE AND DISCHARGED 3 DAYS POST OP. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE REGARDING THIS INCIDENT.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A ROBOTIC ASSISTED TKA SURGERY AND THE CUTS PERFORMED ON THE TIBIA WERE 4MM OFF (OVERCUT) FROM PLANNED RESECTION VALUES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A LARGER POLY INSERT (16 MM) WITH NO KNOWN IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ROBOTIC ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED APPROXIMATELY 1-2MM OF FEMORAL NOTCHING. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROBOTIC ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY THERE WAS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLANNED AND VALIDATED RIGHT FEMORAL CUTS. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED APPROXIMATELY 25 MINUTES. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT.

ROSA Robotic Surgery — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: UPON FURTHER REVIEW, IT IS NOTED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A BLISTER. BLISTERS ARE A FLUID FILLED SAC LOCATED UNDER THE TOP LAYER OF THE SKIN. THESE RESULT DUE TO HEAT OR FRICTION AT THE SITE AND MOST OFTEN RESOLVE ON THEIR OWN. REVIEWING THE OFFICE NOTE PROVIDED, THE DOCTOR DOES NOT MENTION AN INTERVENTION AND STATES HE EXPECTS THE BLISTER TO RESOLVE ON ITS OWN. AS A BLISTER IS A MILD INJURY AND NO INTERVENTION IS NOTED, THIS WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A SERIOUS INJURY OR REPORTABLE.