Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT G1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Alpha 1S (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Weight

Height

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Arm Reach

Manipulation Repeatability

Bimanual Coordination

Tool Use

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Foundation Models

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Force-Limited Arms

Fall Recovery

Human Detection Method

Safe Speed Near Humans

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Simulation Platforms

Open API

Task Success Rate

Deployment Maturity

IP Rating

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Production Pilots

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $95,000 USD | Up to $650 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 4 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 185 kg | 4 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 180 mm | 59 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 20 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 3 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 70 cm | — |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | No |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 2070 TOPS | RM 32位 Cortex-A7 CPU: 900MHz |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000 + Rhino R1 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | GO-1, VLA, LLM | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset, joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, teleoperation, proprietary_app, code_python | modular programming |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | Chinese |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | No |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim, Genie Sim 3.0 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 99.9 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | commercial |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP42 chassis, IP50 arms | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $95,000 USD | Up to $650 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Longcheer Technology | — |
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection, hospitality | 娱乐 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
Frequently asked
AGIBOT G1 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Alpha 1S is made by UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd., based in CN.
AGIBOT G1 launched in 2025. Alpha 1S launched in 2013.
AGIBOT G1 scores 72/100. Alpha 1S scores 68/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AGIBOT G1 vs Alpha 1S compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.