Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT G1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and BINA48 (Hanson Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Manipulation Repeatability


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


IP Rating


Task Success Rate


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Warranty


Production Pilots


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Hong Kong |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2010 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $95,000 USD | $100,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 180 mm | 165 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 185 kg | 75 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 1.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 20 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 32 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 6 | 4 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 70 cm | — |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | No |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 2070 TOPS | NVIDIA Xavier AGX |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000 + Rhino R1 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | GO-1, VLA, LLM | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset, joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, teleoperation, proprietary_app, code_python | proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | Yes |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim, Genie Sim 3.0 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP42 chassis, IP50 arms | IP54 |
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 99.9 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $95,000 USD | $100,000 USD |
| Price Tier | 80-150K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Longcheer Technology | — |
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection, hospitality | research, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time
Frequently asked
AGIBOT G1 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. BINA48 is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK.
AGIBOT G1 launched in 2025. BINA48 launched in 2010.
AGIBOT G1 is listed at $95,000. BINA48 is listed at $100,000.
AGIBOT G1 scores 30/100. BINA48 scores 99/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AGIBOT G1 carries up to 5 kg. BINA48 carries up to 20 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AGIBOT G1 vs BINA48 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.