AGIBOT X1 vs UBTECH Walker S1
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and UBTECH Walker S1 (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
 AGIBOT X1humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.43.9Trust Score |  UBTECH Walker S1humanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.54.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $75,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 172 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 76 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 0.8 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | dynamic walk |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 15 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 41 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | — |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | full bimanual |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | production validated |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | RT-X |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | ROS 2.0 |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | ssm_equivalent |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | Python, C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | NVIDIA Isaac Sim |
| Open API | open rest | open rest |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $75,000 |
| Price Tier | 40-80K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 2 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | BMW Spartanburg, Mercedes-Benz |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | service, entertainment, education |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
AGIBOT X1 vs UBTECH Walker S1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.