Agilik™ vs MATE-XT GO
Side-by-side comparison of Agilik™ (Bionic Power Inc.) and MATE-XT GO (Comau) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Agilik™Canada

- MATE-XT GOItaly

Year First Available
- Agilik™2026

- MATE-XT GO2026

Verified Deployments
- Agilik™0 Deployments

- MATE-XT GO0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Agilik™2 hrs

- MATE-XT GO—

Availability Status
- Agilik™ACTIVE

- MATE-XT GOACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Canada | Italy |
| Year First Available | 2026 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Agilik™ | MATE-XT GO |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Agilik™, MATE-XT GO have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Agilik™ and MATE-XT GO?
Agilik™ is made by Bionic Power Inc., based in CA. MATE-XT GO is made by Comau, based in IT.
When were Agilik™ and MATE-XT GO launched?
Agilik™ launched in 2026. MATE-XT GO launched in 2026.
How do Agilik™ and MATE-XT GO compare on the Robo Index?
Agilik™ grades A on the Robo Index. MATE-XT GO grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Agilik™ and MATE-XT GO in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Agilik™ and MATE-XT GO?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Agilik™ vs MATE-XT GO compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.