AGILOX ONE vs T3
Side-by-side comparison of AGILOX ONE (AGILOX) and T3 (Aethon) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AGILOX ONEAustria
- T3United States
Year First Available
- AGILOX ONE2021
- T32015
Verified Deployments
- AGILOX ONE0 Deployments
- T30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGILOX ONE1 hrs
- T3—
Availability Status
- AGILOX ONEACTIVE
- T3ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- AGILOX ONE900 kg
- T3453.6 kg
AMR Subtype
- AGILOX ONEunit load carrier
- T3tugger tractor
Length
- AGILOX ONE1,511 mm
- T3—
Width
- AGILOX ONE810 mm
- T3—
Turning Radius
- AGILOX ONE2,100 mm
- T3—
Min Aisle Width
- AGILOX ONE1,500 mm
- T3—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- AGILOX ONEslam natural
- T3hybrid
Pedestrian Detection
- AGILOX ONEYes
- T3—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- AGILOX ONEli ion
- T3li ion
Runtime (Loaded)
- AGILOX ONE1 hrs
- T3—
Opportunity Charging
- AGILOX ONEYes
- T3—
Auto Docking
- AGILOX ONEYes
- T3—
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- AGILOX ONEYes
- T3—
Connectivity
API Type
- AGILOX ONEopen rest
- T3—
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- AGILOX ONEYes
- T3—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Austria | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 900 kg | 453.6 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | tugger tractor |
| Length (values differ) | 1,511 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 810 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 2,100 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 1,500 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | hybrid |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | li ion | li ion |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | Yes | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AGILOX ONE | T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AGILOX ONE, T3 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AGILOX ONE and T3?
AGILOX ONE is made by AGILOX, based in AT. T3 is made by Aethon, based in US.
When were AGILOX ONE and T3 launched?
AGILOX ONE launched in 2021. T3 launched in 2015.
How do AGILOX ONE and T3 compare on the Robo Index?
AGILOX ONE grades BBB on the Robo Index. T3 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AGILOX ONE and T3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AGILOX ONE and T3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AGILOX ONE vs T3 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.