Side-by-side comparison of 艾米迎宾接待机器人 (Alpha Robot) and Pibo (Circulus Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Payload

Robot Weight

Compartment Type

Dimensions

Navigation Type

Max Speed

Battery Runtime

Charge Time

Auto Docking

Floor Compatibility

Display Size

Voice Interaction

Languages Supported

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 49 kg | — |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | open trays | — |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 650x560x1500 | — |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | other |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 4 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Integration | ||
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor | — |
| Display & UX | ||
| Display Size (values differ) | 21.5 " | — |
| Voice Interaction (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Languages Supported (values differ) | Chinese | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Tray Count, IP Rating, Min Passable Width, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
艾米迎宾接待机器人 is made by Alpha Robot, based in CN. Pibo is made by Circulus Co., Ltd., based in KR.
艾米迎宾接待机器人 grades A on the Robo Index. Pibo grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
艾米迎宾接待机器人 vs Pibo compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.