Hammer 2.0 vs Starship

Side-by-side comparison of Hammer 2.0 (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and Starship (Starship Technologies) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in

View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

Default Hospitality & F&B Warehousing & Logistics Manufacturing Healthcare & Hospitals Cleaning & Facilities Last-Mile Delivery Agriculture Home & Household

Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Hammer 2.0A

StarshipAA

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

Hammer 2.0China
StarshipUnited States

Year First Available

Hammer 2.02025
Starship2015

Verified Deployments

Hammer 2.00 Deployments
Starship0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

Hammer 2.0Contact for quote
Starship$5,500 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime

Hammer 2.08 hrs
Starship18 hrs

Availability Status

Hammer 2.0ACTIVE
StarshipACTIVE

Physical

Payload

Hammer 2.0500 kg
Starship10 kg

Robot Weight

Hammer 2.01,500 kg
Starship23 kg

Dimensions

Hammer 2.0910x2381x1899
Starship569x678x554

Compartment Type

Hammer 2.0—
Starshipenclosed locked

Navigation & Safety

Navigation Type

Hammer 2.0lidar slam,vision
Starshiplidar slam,vision,hybrid

Max Speed

Hammer 2.00.3 m/s
Starship1.7 m/s

Min Passable Width

Hammer 2.0160 cm
Starship56.9 cm

Obstacle Detection Range

Hammer 2.060 m
Starship61 m

Power

Battery Runtime

Hammer 2.08 hrs
Starship18 hrs

Charge Time

Hammer 2.04 hrs
Starship—

Auto Docking

Hammer 2.0Yes
StarshipYes

Integration

Elevator API

Hammer 2.0Yes
Starship—

Fleet Management

Hammer 2.0centralized cloud
Starshipcentralized cloud

Floor Compatibility

Hammer 2.0hard floor
Starshiphard floor

UX

Noise Level

Hammer 2.070 dB
Starship—

Commercial

Price (USD)

Hammer 2.0Contact for quote
Starship$5,500 USD

	Hammer 2.0deliveryShenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. ARobo Index	StarshipdeliveryStarship Technologies AARobo Index
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)	China	United States
Year First Available (values differ)	2025	2015
Verified Deployments	0 Deployments	0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price (values differ)	Contact for quote	$5,500 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ)	8 hrs	18 hrs
Availability Status	ACTIVE	ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Physical
Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ)	500 kg	10 kg
Robot Weight (values differ)	1,500 kg	23 kg
Dimensions (values differ)	910x2381x1899	569x678x554
Compartment Type (values differ)	—	enclosed locked
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type (values differ)	lidar slam,vision	lidar slam,vision,hybrid
Max Speed (values differ)	0.3 m/s	1.7 m/s
Min Passable Width (values differ)	160 cm	56.9 cm
Obstacle Detection Range (values differ)	60 m	61 m
Power
Battery Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ)	8 hrs	18 hrs
Charge Time (values differ)	4 hrs	—
Auto Docking	Yes	Yes
Integration
Elevator API (values differ)	Yes	—
Fleet Management	centralized cloud	centralized cloud
Floor Compatibility (values differ)	hard floor	hard floor
UX
Noise Level (values differ)	70 dB	—
Commercial
Price (USD) (values differ)	Contact for quote	$5,500 USD

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Tray Count, Tray Capacity, IP Rating, Min Object Detection Height, Hot-Swap Battery, PMS / POS Integration, Display Size, RaaS / Month, Warranty

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Robots (fleet)

Hours / day

Labor $/hr (USD)

Days / year

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metric	Hammer 2.0	Starship
Investment	No price	$5,500
Payback period	—	1.3 mo
Net savings (5 yr)	—	$244,500
ROI (5 yr)	—	+4445%

Hammer 2.0 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes Hammer 2.0 and Starship?

Hammer 2.0 is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. Starship is made by Starship Technologies, based in US.

When were Hammer 2.0 and Starship launched?

Hammer 2.0 launched in 2025. Starship launched in 2015.

How do Hammer 2.0 and Starship compare on the Robo Index?

Hammer 2.0 grades A on the Robo Index. Starship grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

What is the payload difference between Hammer 2.0 and Starship?

Hammer 2.0 carries up to 500 kg. Starship carries up to 10 kg.

Are Hammer 2.0 and Starship in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Delivery on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Hammer 2.0 and Starship?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Other comparisons

About this comparison

Hammer 2.0 vs Starship compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.