AI Sweet Mate vs Ameca
Side-by-side comparison of AI Sweet Mate (Noetix) and Ameca (Engineered Arts) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AI Sweet MateChina
- AmecaUnited Kingdom
Year First Available
- AI Sweet Mate2025
- Ameca2021
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AI Sweet Mate$2,785 USD
- Ameca$250,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AI Sweet Mate2.5 hrs
- Ameca5 hrs
Availability Status
- AI Sweet MateACTIVE
- AmecaACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AI Sweet Mate98 mm
- Ameca1870 mm
Weight
- AI Sweet Mate17 kg
- Ameca62 kg
Mobility Type
- AI Sweet Matebipedal
- Amecabipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AI Sweet Matefull bipedal
- Amecafull bipedal
Terrain
- AI Sweet Mateflat_indoor
- Amecaindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AI Sweet Mate—
- Ameca2 kg
Total DOF
- AI Sweet Mate21
- Ameca61
Arm DOF
- AI Sweet Mate4
- Ameca5
Hand DOF
- AI Sweet Mate—
- Ameca4
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AI Sweet Mate6 TOPS
- AmecaTritium robot OS
Teleoperation
- AI Sweet Matemobile_app
- Ameca—
Programming
- AI Sweet Matevisual_block, proprietary_app
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AI Sweet Mate2.5 hrs
- Ameca5 hrs
Charging Method
- AI Sweet Matemanual swap
- Ameca—
Battery Swap
- AI Sweet MateYes
- Ameca—
Safety
Fall Recovery
- AI Sweet MateYes
- Ameca—
Software
SDK Languages
- AI Sweet Matevisual_block, proprietary_app
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
Open API
- AI Sweet MateYes
- Ameca—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- AI Sweet Mateproduction pilot
- Amecacommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AI Sweet Mate$2,785 USD
- Ameca$250,000 USD
Price Tier
- AI Sweet Mate<10K
- Ameca150K+
Pricing Model
- AI Sweet Matecapex
- Amecapurchase
Applications
- AI Sweet Mateeducation, research
- Amecahuman-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United Kingdom |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2021 |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $2,785 USD | $250,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 98 mm | 1870 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 17 kg | 62 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 21 | 61 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 4 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 6 TOPS | Tritium robot OS |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | mobile_app | — |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, proprietary_app | Python, C++, block‑based coding |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | visual_block, proprietary_app | Python, C++, block‑based coding |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,785 USD | $250,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | education, research | human-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AI Sweet Mate | Ameca |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $2,785 | $250,000 |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | 60.0 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $247,215 | $0 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +8877% | +0% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AI Sweet Mate and Ameca?
AI Sweet Mate is made by Noetix, based in CN. Ameca is made by Engineered Arts, based in GB.
When were AI Sweet Mate and Ameca launched?
AI Sweet Mate launched in 2025. Ameca launched in 2021.
How much does AI Sweet Mate cost compared to Ameca?
AI Sweet Mate is listed at $2,785. Ameca is listed at $250,000.
How do AI Sweet Mate and Ameca compare on the Robo Score?
AI Sweet Mate scores 61.3 on the Robo Score. Ameca scores 61.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AI Sweet Mate and Ameca in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AI Sweet Mate and Ameca?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AI Sweet Mate vs Ameca compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.