AI Sweet Mate vs Mindar
Side-by-side comparison of AI Sweet Mate (Noetix) and Mindar (Kokoro) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AI Sweet MateChina
- Mindar—
Year First Available
- AI Sweet Mate2025
- Mindar2019
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AI Sweet Mate$2,785 USD
- Mindar$909,090 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AI Sweet Mate2.5 hrs
- Mindar48 hrs
Availability Status
- AI Sweet MateACTIVE
- MindarACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AI Sweet Mate98 mm
- Mindar195 mm
Weight
- AI Sweet Mate17 kg
- Mindar57 kg
Mobility Type
- AI Sweet Matebipedal
- Mindarstatic
Humanoid Subtype
- AI Sweet Matefull bipedal
- Mindarfull bipedal
Stair Climbing
- AI Sweet Mate—
- MindarNo
Terrain
- AI Sweet Mateflat_indoor
- Mindarindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AI Sweet Mate—
- Mindar100 kg
Total DOF
- AI Sweet Mate21
- Mindar—
Arm DOF
- AI Sweet Mate4
- Mindar—
Bimanual Coordination
- AI Sweet Mate—
- MindarNo
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AI Sweet Mate6 TOPS
- MindarIntel® Core™ Ultra X9 388H processor
VLM Capable
- AI Sweet Mate—
- MindarNo
Foundation Models
- AI Sweet Mate—
- Mindarfalse
Imitation Learning
- AI Sweet Mate—
- MindarNo
Teleoperation
- AI Sweet Matemobile_app
- Mindar—
Programming
- AI Sweet Matevisual_block, proprietary_app
- Mindar—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AI Sweet Mate2.5 hrs
- Mindar48 hrs
Charging Method
- AI Sweet Matemanual swap
- Mindar—
Battery Swap
- AI Sweet MateYes
- MindarNo
Safety
Fall Recovery
- AI Sweet MateYes
- Mindar—
Software
SDK Languages
- AI Sweet Matevisual_block, proprietary_app
- Mindar—
ROS Support
- AI Sweet Mate—
- MindarNo
Open API
- AI Sweet MateYes
- MindarNo
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- AI Sweet Mateproduction pilot
- Mindarcommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AI Sweet Mate$2,785 USD
- Mindar$909,090 USD
Price Tier
- AI Sweet Mate<10K
- Mindar150K+
Pricing Model
- AI Sweet Matecapex
- Mindaroutright purchase
Applications
- AI Sweet Mateeducation, research
- Mindarreligious service, cultural education
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2019 |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $2,785 USD | $909,090 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 48 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 98 mm | 195 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 17 kg | 57 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 100 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 21 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 6 TOPS | Intel® Core™ Ultra X9 388H processor |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | mobile_app | — |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, proprietary_app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 48 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | visual_block, proprietary_app | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | No |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,785 USD | $909,090 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | outright purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | education, research | religious service, cultural education |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AI Sweet Mate | Mindar |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $2,785 | $909,090 |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | 218.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $247,215 | -$659,090 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +8877% | -72% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AI Sweet Mate and Mindar?
AI Sweet Mate is made by Noetix, based in CN. Mindar is made by Kokoro.
When were AI Sweet Mate and Mindar launched?
AI Sweet Mate launched in 2025. Mindar launched in 2019.
How much does AI Sweet Mate cost compared to Mindar?
AI Sweet Mate is listed at $2,785. Mindar is listed at $909,090.
How do AI Sweet Mate and Mindar compare on the Robo Score?
AI Sweet Mate scores 61.3 on the Robo Score. Mindar scores 68.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AI Sweet Mate and Mindar in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AI Sweet Mate and Mindar?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AI Sweet Mate vs Mindar compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.