Side-by-side comparison of AMB-300XS (Gongboshi Robot Technology Co., Ltd.) and OCME LGV (OCME) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Verified Deployments

Price

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Payload Capacity

Max Speed

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Italy |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $20,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 12 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 300 kg | 1,500 kg |
| Max Speed | 1.5 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AMB-300XS | OCME LGV |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $20,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 4.8 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $230,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1150% | — |
OCME LGV has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
AMB-300XS is made by Gongboshi Robot Technology Co., Ltd.. OCME LGV is made by OCME, based in IT.
AMB-300XS grades BBB on the Robo Index. OCME LGV grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AMB-300XS carries up to 300 kg. OCME LGV carries up to 1500 kg.
Both robots are classified as Agv on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Agv TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AMB-300XS vs OCME LGV compares two robots in the agv category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.