闪电匣Arm vs Explorer
Side-by-side comparison of 闪电匣Arm (Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd.) and Explorer (OC Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- 闪电匣ArmChina
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
Year First Available
- 闪电匣Arm2024
- Explorer2009
Verified Deployments
- 闪电匣Arm0 Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 闪电匣Arm8 hrs
- Explorer—
Availability Status
- 闪电匣ArmACTIVE
- ExplorerACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- 闪电匣Arm55 kg
- Explorer18.6 kg
Payload
- 闪电匣Arm10 kg
- Explorer20 kg
Reach
- 闪电匣Arm2,000 mm
- Explorer2,500 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- 闪电匣Arm7
- Explorer—
Performance
Duty Cycle
- 闪电匣Armcontinuous 24 7
- Explorer—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- 闪电匣Arm—
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
Programming Languages
- 闪电匣ArmPython
- Explorer—
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- 闪电匣Armvendor supported
- Explorer—
IoT / Cloud Platform
- 闪电匣ArmPUDU Link & Remote Operations Platform
- Explorer—
End-Effector
Internal Cable Routing
- 闪电匣Armthrough arm and wrist
- Explorer—
Commercial
Service Network
- 闪电匣Armglobal
- Explorer—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United Kingdom |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 55 kg | 18.6 kg |
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 20 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,000 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | continuous 24 7 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | Control and simulation unit |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | Python | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | vendor supported | — |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | PUDU Link & Remote Operations Platform | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | through arm and wrist | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | global | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | 闪电匣Arm | Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
闪电匣Arm, Explorer have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes 闪电匣Arm and Explorer?
闪电匣Arm is made by Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB.
When were 闪电匣Arm and Explorer launched?
闪电匣Arm launched in 2024. Explorer launched in 2009.
How do 闪电匣Arm and Explorer compare on the Robo Index?
闪电匣Arm grades AA on the Robo Index. Explorer grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of 闪电匣Arm compare to Explorer?
闪电匣Arm has a reach of 2000 mm. Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm.
Are 闪电匣Arm and Explorer in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between 闪电匣Arm and Explorer?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
闪电匣Arm vs Explorer compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.