AUBO-C5 vs Aura
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-C5 (AUBO) and Aura (Comau) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-C5United States
- AuraItaly
Year First Available
- AUBO-C5—
- Aura2016
Verified Deployments
- AUBO-C50 Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AUBO-C5Contact for quote
- Aura$80,000 USD
Availability Status
- AUBO-C5ACTIVE
- AuraACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- AUBO-C55 kg
- Aura170 kg
Reach
- AUBO-C51,300 mm
- Aura2,800 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-C5—
- Aura6
Repeatability
- AUBO-C5±0.05 mm
- Aura—
Mounting Options
- AUBO-C5floor, ceiling, wall
- Auraupside down
IP Rating
- AUBO-C5IP54
- Aura—
Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-C5ISO/TS 15066
- AuraISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-C5none
- AuraYes
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-C5Yes
- Aura—
Offline Programming
- AUBO-C5Yes
- Aura—
Programming Interface
- AUBO-C5drag_and_drop, visual_block
- Aurano_code_gui
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-C5ISO 9409-1-A50
- Aura—
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-C5EtherCAT, Profinet
- Aura—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AUBO-C5Contact for quote
- Aura$80,000 USD
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | Italy |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $80,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 170 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,300 mm | 2,800 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | upside down |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating | ISO/TS 15066 | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | drag_and_drop, visual_block | no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Profinet | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $80,000 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-C5 | Aura |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $80,000 |
| Payback period | — | 19.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $170,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +213% |
AUBO-C5 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-C5 and Aura?
AUBO-C5 is made by AUBO, based in US. Aura is made by Comau, based in IT.
How do AUBO-C5 and Aura compare on the Robo Score?
AUBO-C5 scores 57.3 on the Robo Score. Aura scores 73.8. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AUBO-C5 and Aura in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-C5 and Aura?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-C5 vs Aura compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.