Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i3 (AUBO) and CR-0709 (Jiangsu Thinkmotion Intelligent Machine Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Availability Status

Payload

Max TCP Speed

IP Rating

Reach

Degrees of Freedom

Repeatability

Robot Weight

Safety Rating

Force/Torque Sensing

Setup Time

No-Code Capable

Offline Programming

Programming Interface

ROS Compatible

Fieldbus Protocols

Price (USD)

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $14,990–$19,700 | $22,199 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 3 kg | 7 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 3 m/s |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Reach (values differ) | 625 mm | 990 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 16 kg | 24.5 kg |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | PL=d, CAT 3, CE, UL, KCs, CR, SEMI S2 | ISO 13849, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming | No | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, teach_pendant | graphical user interface, drag to teach |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Modbus RTU, Modbus TCP, TCP/IP | TCP/IP, Modbus, Wi-Fi |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $14,990–$19,700 | $22,199 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Mounting Options, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
Frequently asked
AUBO-i3 is made by AUBO, based in US. CR-0709 is made by Jiangsu Thinkmotion Intelligent Machine Technology Co., Ltd..
AUBO-i3 scores 47/100. CR-0709 scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AUBO-i3 has a reach of 625 mm. CR-0709 has a reach of 1300 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
AUBO-i3 vs CR-0709 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.