AUBO-i3 vs UR10e
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i3 (AUBO) and UR10e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i3United States
- UR10eDenmark
Year First Available
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10e2008
Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i30 Deployments
- UR10e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- AUBO-i3$14,990–$19,700
- UR10e$27,000
Availability Status
- AUBO-i3ACTIVE
- UR10eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- AUBO-i33 kg
- UR10e10 kg
Reach
- AUBO-i3625 mm
- UR10e1,300 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i36
- UR10e6
Repeatability
- AUBO-i3±0.05 mm
- UR10e±0.05 mm
Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i31.9 m/s
- UR10e1 m/s
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i316 kg
- UR10e33.5 kg
Mounting Options
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10efloor, ceiling, wall, rail
IP Rating
- AUBO-i3IP54
- UR10eIP54
Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i3PL=d, CAT 3, CE, UL, KCs, CR, SEMI S2
- UR10eCat3 PLd
Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i3none
- UR10ewrist external
Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10e24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- AUBO-i30.5 hrs
- UR10e—
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i3Yes
- UR10eYes
Offline Programming
- AUBO-i3No
- UR10eYes
Programming Interface
- AUBO-i3code_python, code_ros, teach_pendant
- UR10eteach_pendant, no_code_gui
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10eiso 9283
Tool Changer Support
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10eautomatic
Integrated F/T Sensor
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10eYes
Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10e24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10ePython, C++, URScript, .NET
ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i3Yes
- UR10e—
Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i3Modbus RTU, Modbus TCP, TCP/IP
- UR10eMODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet
Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i3—
- UR10eYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AUBO-i3$14,990–$19,700
- UR10e$27,000
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $14,990–$19,700 | $27,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 10 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 625 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability | ±0.05 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 16 kg | 33.5 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor, ceiling, wall, rail |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | PL=d, CAT 3, CE, UL, KCs, CR, SEMI S2 | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | wrist external |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, teach_pendant | teach_pendant, no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | automatic |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, URScript, .NET |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Modbus RTU, Modbus TCP, TCP/IP | MODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $14,990–$19,700 | $27,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i3 and UR10e?
AUBO-i3 is made by AUBO, based in US. UR10e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
How do AUBO-i3 and UR10e compare on the Robolist Product Score?
AUBO-i3 scores 47/100. UR10e scores 69/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of AUBO-i3 compare to UR10e?
AUBO-i3 has a reach of 625 mm. UR10e has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are AUBO-i3 and UR10e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i3 and UR10e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
AUBO-i3 vs UR10e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.