AM-150 vs EffiBOT
Side-by-side comparison of AM-150 (Aurotek Corporation) and EffiBOT (Effidence) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AM-150Taiwan
- EffiBOTFrance
Year First Available
- AM-1502014
- EffiBOT2015
Verified Deployments
- AM-1500 Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AM-150—
- EffiBOT8 hrs
Availability Status
- AM-150ACTIVE
- EffiBOTACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- AM-150150 kg
- EffiBOT500 kg
AMR Subtype
- AM-150unit load carrier
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
Length
- AM-150—
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
Width
- AM-150—
- EffiBOT660 mm
Turning Radius
- AM-150—
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
Min Aisle Width
- AM-150700 mm
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
Robot Weight
- AM-15066 kg
- EffiBOT140 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- AM-150slam natural
- EffiBOTslam natural
Pedestrian Detection
- AM-150—
- EffiBOTYes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- AM-150li fepo4
- EffiBOTli ion
Battery Capacity
- AM-1502.4 kWh
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
Charging Time
- AM-150—
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- AM-150—
- EffiBOT360 °
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Taiwan | France |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 150 kg | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype | unit load carrier | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,450 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 660 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 1,200 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 700 mm | 3,300 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 66 kg | 140 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | slam natural | slam natural |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li fepo4 | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2.4 kWh | 1.6 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 3.5 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AM-150 | EffiBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AM-150, EffiBOT have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AM-150 and EffiBOT?
AM-150 is made by Aurotek Corporation, based in TW. EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR.
When were AM-150 and EffiBOT launched?
AM-150 launched in 2014. EffiBOT launched in 2015.
How do AM-150 and EffiBOT compare on the Robo Score?
AM-150 scores 61.5 on the Robo Score. EffiBOT scores 72.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AM-150 and EffiBOT in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AM-150 and EffiBOT?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AM-150 vs EffiBOT compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.