Eva vs M0617
Side-by-side comparison of Eva (Automata Technologies Ltd) and M0617 (Doosan Robotics Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Prices in
View savedOptimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EvaUnited Kingdom
- M0617South Korea
Year First Available
- Eva2015
- M06172021
Verified Deployments
- Eva0 Deployments
- M06170 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Eva$23,000 USD
- M0617Contact for quote
Availability Status
- EvaACTIVE
- M0617ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Eva1.3 kg
- M0617—
Reach
- Eva600 mm
- M0617—
Degrees of Freedom
- Eva6
- M06176
Repeatability
- Eva±0.5 mm
- M0617±0.03 mm
Robot Weight
- Eva2.3 kg
- M0617—
Mounting Options
- Eva—
- M0617floor/wall
IP Rating
- EvaIP20
- M0617—
Safety
Safety Rating
- EvaIP20K
- M0617ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- Evanone
- M0617none
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- Eva—
- M06174 hrs
Programming Interface
- Evaeasy-to-program
- M0617teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, no_code_gui
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- Eva—
- M0617Yes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Eva$23,000 USD
- M0617Contact for quote
Warranty
- Eva1 yrs
- M06172 yrs
Lead Time
- Eva—
- M06176 wks
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2021 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $23,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1.3 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 600 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 2.3 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor/wall |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP20 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | IP20K | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | easy-to-program | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, no_code_gui |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $23,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 6 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Eva | M0617 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $23,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 5.5 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $227,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +987% | — |
M0617 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Eva and M0617?
Eva is made by Automata Technologies Ltd, based in GB. M0617 is made by Doosan Robotics Inc., based in KR.
When were Eva and M0617 launched?
Eva launched in 2015. M0617 launched in 2021.
How do Eva and M0617 compare on the Robo Index?
Eva grades AA on the Robo Index. M0617 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Eva and M0617 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Eva and M0617?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
Eva vs M0617 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.