Side-by-side comparison of BINA48 (Hanson Robotics) and Elf 3 Humanoid Robot (BXI Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Arm Reach


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Charging Time


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Avg Power Consumption


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


Deployment Maturity


IP Rating


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Warranty


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Hong Kong | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2010 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 USD | $36,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 165 mm | 145 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 75 kg | 37 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | static | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | anthropomorphic torso | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 5 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 32 | 41 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 48 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | independent |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | none |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Xavier AGX | Intel i7 CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel i7 CPU + optional NVIDIA Jetson |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | none |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick, web_interface |
| Programming (values differ) | proprietary_app | code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.5 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | — | 28 W |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | none |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | proprietary_app | ROS1 |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | ros1 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | MuJoCo |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | open rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 USD | $36,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 1 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | research, teleoperation | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
BINA48 is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK. Elf 3 Humanoid Robot is made by BXI Robotics, based in CN.
BINA48 launched in 2010. Elf 3 Humanoid Robot launched in 2026.
BINA48 is listed at $100,000. Elf 3 Humanoid Robot is listed at $36,000.
BINA48 scores 99/100. Elf 3 Humanoid Robot scores 95/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
BINA48 carries up to 20 kg. Elf 3 Humanoid Robot carries up to 5 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
BINA48 vs Elf 3 Humanoid Robot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.