Side-by-side comparison of BINA48 (Hanson Robotics) and QTrobot RD-V2 i5 (LuxAI) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Bimanual Coordination

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Foundation Models

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Battery Swap

Human Detection Method

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Open API

Air-Gap Capable

IP Rating

Deployment Maturity

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Developer Unit Price

Warranty

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Hong Kong | Luxembourg |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2010 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 USD | $11,900 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 165 mm | 50 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | 75 kg | 5 kg |
| Mobility Type | static | static |
| Humanoid Subtype | anthropomorphic torso | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 32 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 3 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | independent |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Xavier AGX | 275 TOPS |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | onboard small |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | Llama-2, Vicuna-13B |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | web_interface |
| Programming (values differ) | proprietary_app | code_python, code_ros, visual_block, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | proprietary_app | Python, C++, JavaScript |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | ros2 vendor |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | open rest |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 USD | $11,900 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $11,900 |
| Warranty | 2 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | research, teleoperation | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
BINA48 is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK. QTrobot RD-V2 i5 is made by LuxAI, based in LU.
BINA48 is listed at $100,000. QTrobot RD-V2 i5 is listed at $11,900.
BINA48 scores 99/100. QTrobot RD-V2 i5 scores 58/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
BINA48 vs QTrobot RD-V2 i5 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.