Side-by-side comparison of BUTLERBOT W3 (Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd.) and CW-F Delivery Service Robot (Shanghai Chuangwang Industrial Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robolist Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Payload

Robot Weight

Tray Count

Compartment Type

Dimensions

Navigation Type

Max Speed

Battery Runtime

Auto Docking

Hot-Swap Battery

PMS / POS Integration

Fleet Management

Floor Compatibility

Voice Interaction

Languages Supported

Price (USD)

![]() CW-F Delivery Service Robothospitality-serviceShanghai Chuangwang Industrial Co., Ltd 81.4Robolist Index | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $15,000 | $3,680 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 12 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 10 kg |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 68 kg |
| Tray Count | 4 | 4 |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | closed drawer | open trays |
| Dimensions (values differ) | — | 733x549x729 |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1.8 m/s |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 12 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Hot-Swap Battery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Integration | ||
| PMS / POS Integration (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fleet Management (values differ) | — | single dashboard |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | — | hard floor |
| Display & UX | ||
| Voice Interaction (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Languages Supported (values differ) | — | Chinese |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $15,000 | $3,680 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, IP Rating, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Elevator API, Display Size, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
BUTLERBOT W3 is made by Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN. CW-F Delivery Service Robot is made by Shanghai Chuangwang Industrial Co., Ltd, based in CN.
BUTLERBOT W3 is listed at $15,000. CW-F Delivery Service Robot is listed at $3,680.
BUTLERBOT W3 scores 60/100. CW-F Delivery Service Robot scores 81/100. The Robolist Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
BUTLERBOT W3 vs CW-F Delivery Service Robot compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Index is calculated.