Charlie vs InMoov
Side-by-side comparison of Charlie (DFKI Robotics Innovation Center) and InMoov (Gael Langevin) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 CharliehumanoidDFKI Robotics Innovation Center10.0Trust Score |  InMoovhumanoidGael Langevin—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available | 2012 | 2012 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 24 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 25 cm | 1800 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 18 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | research platform | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 120 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 6 | 50 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 8 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Mini ITX computer with DFKI ZynqBrain | Arduino microcontrollers (Uno, Mega) |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | vr_headset |
| Programming (values differ) | joystick, teleoperation | code_python, code_ros, web-based UI, remote control |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 24 hrs | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | joystick, teleoperation | code_python, code_ros, web-based UI, remote control |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Model (values differ) | lease | — |
| Applications (values differ) | space robotics | education & STEM, research, maker projects, museum installations |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Price Range (USD), Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Charlie vs InMoov compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.