Side-by-side comparison of CNC (Jinan Artech Machinery Co., Ltd.) and SZGH-1820-A (Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Reach


Repeatability


Payload


Degrees of Freedom


Robot Weight


Duty Cycle


Controller Model


Programming Languages


Offline Programming


Tool Flange Standard


Price (USD)


Warranty


Service Network


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $5,000 | $1,999–$12,688 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 2,700 mm | 1,850 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.07 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 210 kg | 6 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 165 kg |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle | continuous 24 7 | continuous 24 7 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | KUKA KR210 | Integrated (All-In-One) |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | KRL | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | SmartMill1.9, RobCode | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $5,000 | $1,999–$12,688 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Service Network (values differ) | sparse | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Teach Pendant Type, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
Frequently asked
CNC is made by Jinan Artech Machinery Co., Ltd., based in CN. SZGH-1820-A is made by Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd., based in CN.
CNC scores 27/100. SZGH-1820-A scores 47/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
CNC has a reach of 1500 mm. SZGH-1820-A has a reach of 1850 mm.
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
CNC vs SZGH-1820-A compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.