Core vs M1013
Side-by-side comparison of Core (Standard Bots) and M1013 (Doosan Robotics Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CoreUnited States
- M1013South Korea
Year First Available
- Core—
- M10132015
Verified Deployments
- Core0 Deployments
- M10130 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Core$37,000–$42,000 USD
- M1013$42,000 USD
Availability Status
- CoreACTIVE
- M1013ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- Core1,300 mm
- M10131,300 mm
Repeatability
- Core±0.025 mm
- M1013±0.1 mm
Payload
- Core18 kg
- M101310 kg
IP Rating
- Core—
- M1013IP54
Degrees of Freedom
- Core6
- M10136
Max TCP Speed
- Core3 m/s
- M10131.5 m/s
Robot Weight
- Core32 kg
- M1013—
Mounting Options
- Corefloor, mobile
- M1013floor, ceiling, wall
Safety
Safety Rating
- Corenot stated
- M1013Cat4 PLe
Force/Torque Sensing
- Corenone
- M1013joint level all
Power/Force Limiting
- Core—
- M10130.2 N
Duty Cycle
- Core—
- M101324 7 continuous
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- Core—
- M10131 hrs
No-Code Capable
- CoreYes
- M1013Yes
Offline Programming
- CoreNo
- M1013Yes
Programming Interface
- Coreno-code visual programming
- M1013teach_pendant, code_python, code_ros
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Core—
- M1013iso 9283
Tool Changer Support
- Core—
- M1013manual
Integrated F/T Sensor
- Core—
- M1013Yes
Wrist Power Supply
- Core—
- M101324V DC + 6 bar pneumatic
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- Core—
- M1013Python, C++, .NET
ROS Compatible
- CoreNo
- M1013Yes
Fieldbus Protocols
- Core—
- M1013EtherCAT, Profinet
Digital Twin Support
- Core—
- M1013Yes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Core$37,000–$42,000 USD
- M1013$42,000 USD
Warranty
- Core—
- M10132 yrs
Lead Time
- Core4 wks
- M10134 wks
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $37,000–$42,000 USD | $42,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) | 1,300 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.025 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 18 kg | 10 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 3 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 32 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, mobile | floor, ceiling, wall |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | not stated | Cat4 PLe |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | joint level all |
| Power/Force Limiting (values differ) | — | 0.2 N |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no-code visual programming | teach_pendant, code_python, code_ros |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | manual |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, .NET |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | EtherCAT, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $37,000–$42,000 USD | $42,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Lead Time | 4 wks | 4 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Core | M1013 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $39,500 | $42,000 |
| Payback period | 9.5 mo | 10.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $210,500 | $208,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +533% | +495% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Core and M1013?
Core is made by Standard Bots, based in US. M1013 is made by Doosan Robotics Inc., based in KR.
How do Core and M1013 compare on the Robo Index?
Core grades A on the Robo Index. M1013 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Core compare to M1013?
Core has a reach of 1300 mm. M1013 has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are Core and M1013 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Core and M1013?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Core vs M1013 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.