CU4-200L vs Freight 500
Side-by-side comparison of CU4-200L (Wesar (Suzhou) Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd) and Freight 500 (Fetch Robotics Inc. (acquired by Zebra Technologies 2021)) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CU4-200LChina
- Freight 500United States
Year First Available
- CU4-200L—
- Freight 5002017
Verified Deployments
- CU4-200L0 Deployments
- Freight 5000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- CU4-200LContact for quote
- Freight 500$35,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- CU4-200L6 hrs
- Freight 5009 hrs
Availability Status
- CU4-200LACTIVE
- Freight 500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- CU4-200L—
- Freight 500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- CU4-200L—
- Freight 500other
Width
- CU4-200L—
- Freight 5001,016 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- CU4-200Lqr code,lidar slam
- Freight 500other
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- CU4-200L—
- Freight 500other
Commercial
Price (USD)
- CU4-200LContact for quote
- Freight 500$35,000 USD
Warranty
- CU4-200L1 yrs
- Freight 500—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $35,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | — | other |
| Width (values differ) | — | 1,016 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | qr code,lidar slam | other |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | other |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $35,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | CU4-200L | Freight 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $35,000 |
| Payback period | — | 8.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $215,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +614% |
CU4-200L has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes CU4-200L and Freight 500?
CU4-200L is made by Wesar (Suzhou) Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd, based in CN. Freight 500 is made by Fetch Robotics Inc. (acquired by Zebra Technologies 2021), based in US.
How do CU4-200L and Freight 500 compare on the Robo Score?
CU4-200L scores 46.0 on the Robo Score. Freight 500 scores 70.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are CU4-200L and Freight 500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between CU4-200L and Freight 500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
CU4-200L vs Freight 500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.