Side-by-side comparison of CW-R1 Bipedal Robot (Henan Chuangwang Intelligent Equipment Co., LTD) and Sanbot Nano (Sanbot Innovation Technology) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Arm Reach

Bimanual Coordination

Tool Use

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Battery Capacity

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Force-Limited Arms

Fall Recovery

Human Detection Method

Safe Speed Near Humans

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Simulation Platforms

Open API

Deployment Maturity

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Warranty

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $4,900 | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 121 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 25 kg | 19 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | wheeled humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 0.8 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing | none | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 75 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 24 | 8 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | 10 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 43.5 cm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | none | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin (optional, EDU) | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| VLM Capable | none | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.3 kWh |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method | vision human | vision human |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | none | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | ros1 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | beta pilot | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,900 | $3,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research | home, education, healthcare, public_service |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
CW-R1 Bipedal Robot is made by Henan Chuangwang Intelligent Equipment Co., LTD, based in CN. Sanbot Nano is made by Sanbot Innovation Technology.
CW-R1 Bipedal Robot launched in 2025. Sanbot Nano launched in 2017.
CW-R1 Bipedal Robot is listed at $4,900. Sanbot Nano is listed at $3,000.
CW-R1 Bipedal Robot scores 46/100. Sanbot Nano scores 56/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
CW-R1 Bipedal Robot carries up to 2 kg. Sanbot Nano carries up to 75 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
CW-R1 Bipedal Robot vs Sanbot Nano compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.