EffiBOT vs FlexPorter GO
Side-by-side comparison of EffiBOT (Effidence) and FlexPorter GO (Syrius Technology) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EffiBOTFrance
- FlexPorter GOChina
Year First Available
- EffiBOT2015
- FlexPorter GO—
Verified Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
- FlexPorter GO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EffiBOT8 hrs
- FlexPorter GO—
Availability Status
- EffiBOTACTIVE
- FlexPorter GOACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EffiBOT500 kg
- FlexPorter GO1,000 kg
AMR Subtype
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
- FlexPorter GOunit load carrier
Length
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
- FlexPorter GO—
Width
- EffiBOT660 mm
- FlexPorter GO—
Turning Radius
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
- FlexPorter GO—
Min Aisle Width
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
- FlexPorter GO—
Robot Weight
- EffiBOT140 kg
- FlexPorter GO250 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EffiBOTslam natural
- FlexPorter GOslam natural
Pedestrian Detection
- EffiBOTYes
- FlexPorter GO—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EffiBOTli ion
- FlexPorter GOli ion
Battery Capacity
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
- FlexPorter GO—
Charging Time
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
- FlexPorter GO—
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EffiBOT360 °
- FlexPorter GO—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 500 kg | 1,000 kg |
| AMR Subtype | unit load carrier | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 1,450 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 660 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,200 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 3,300 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | 250 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | slam natural | slam natural |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | li ion | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.6 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3.5 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EffiBOT | FlexPorter GO |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EffiBOT, FlexPorter GO have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EffiBOT and FlexPorter GO?
EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR. FlexPorter GO is made by Syrius Technology, based in CN.
How do EffiBOT and FlexPorter GO compare on the Robo Score?
EffiBOT scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. FlexPorter GO scores 54.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EffiBOT and FlexPorter GO in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EffiBOT and FlexPorter GO?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EffiBOT vs FlexPorter GO compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.