EffiBOT vs MC250
Side-by-side comparison of EffiBOT (Effidence) and MC250 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EffiBOTFrance
- MC250Denmark
Year First Available
- EffiBOT2015
- MC250—
Verified Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
- MC2500 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EffiBOT8 hrs
- MC25017.5 hrs
Availability Status
- EffiBOTACTIVE
- MC250ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EffiBOT500 kg
- MC250250 kg
AMR Subtype
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
- MC250—
Length
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
- MC250800 mm
Width
- EffiBOT660 mm
- MC250580 mm
Turning Radius
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
- MC2500 mm
Min Aisle Width
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
- MC250850 mm
Ground Clearance
- EffiBOT—
- MC25025 mm
Robot Weight
- EffiBOT140 kg
- MC250—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EffiBOTslam natural
- MC250lidar slam,vision
Localization Accuracy
- EffiBOT—
- MC25060 mm
Docking Repeatability
- EffiBOT—
- MC2503 mm
Obstacle Detection Range
- EffiBOT—
- MC2501.2 m
Min Object Detection Height
- EffiBOT—
- MC25025 cm
Pedestrian Detection
- EffiBOTYes
- MC250Yes
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- EffiBOT—
- MC2502 m/s
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- EffiBOT—
- MC2502 m/s
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EffiBOTli ion
- MC250li ion nmc
Battery Capacity
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
- MC250—
Runtime (Loaded)
- EffiBOT—
- MC25013 hrs
Charging Time
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
- MC250—
Opportunity Charging
- EffiBOT—
- MC250Yes
Auto Docking
- EffiBOT—
- MC250Yes
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- EffiBOT—
- MC2503000
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- EffiBOT—
- MC250Yes
R15.08 Certified
- EffiBOT—
- MC250Yes
Safety Category
- EffiBOT—
- MC250Cat.3 PLd
Emergency Stops
- EffiBOT—
- MC2501
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EffiBOT360 °
- MC250360 °
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | 250 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | — |
| Length (values differ) | 1,450 mm | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | 660 mm | 580 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,200 mm | 0 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 3,300 mm | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam,vision |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 25 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | li ion nmc |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.6 kWh | — |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3.5 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage | 360 ° | 360 ° |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Swap, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EffiBOT | MC250 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EffiBOT, MC250 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EffiBOT and MC250?
EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR. MC250 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do EffiBOT and MC250 compare on the Robo Score?
EffiBOT scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. MC250 scores 52.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EffiBOT and MC250 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EffiBOT and MC250?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EffiBOT vs MC250 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.