EffiBOT vs VNR 16
Side-by-side comparison of EffiBOT (Effidence) and VNR 16 (VisionNav) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EffiBOTFrance
- VNR 16China
Year First Available
- EffiBOT2015
- VNR 16—
Verified Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
- VNR 160 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EffiBOT8 hrs
- VNR 16—
Availability Status
- EffiBOTACTIVE
- VNR 16ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EffiBOT500 kg
- VNR 161,600 kg
AMR Subtype
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
- VNR 16pallet mover
Length
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
- VNR 16—
Width
- EffiBOT660 mm
- VNR 16—
Turning Radius
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
- VNR 161,788 mm
Min Aisle Width
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
- VNR 162,847 mm
Robot Weight
- EffiBOT140 kg
- VNR 16—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EffiBOTslam natural
- VNR 16—
Pedestrian Detection
- EffiBOTYes
- VNR 16—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EffiBOTli ion
- VNR 16—
Battery Capacity
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
- VNR 16—
Charging Time
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
- VNR 16—
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- EffiBOT—
- VNR 16Yes
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EffiBOT360 °
- VNR 16360 °
Connectivity
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- EffiBOT—
- VNR 16Yes
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 500 kg | 1,600 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | pallet mover |
| Length (values differ) | 1,450 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 660 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,200 mm | 1,788 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 3,300 mm | 2,847 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.6 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3.5 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage | 360 ° | 360 ° |
| Connectivity | ||
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | — | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EffiBOT | VNR 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EffiBOT, VNR 16 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EffiBOT and VNR 16?
EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR. VNR 16 is made by VisionNav, based in CN.
How do EffiBOT and VNR 16 compare on the Robo Score?
EffiBOT scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. VNR 16 scores 52.2. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EffiBOT and VNR 16 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EffiBOT and VNR 16?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EffiBOT vs VNR 16 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.