EMMA K vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of EMMA K (IPLUSMOBOT) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EMMA KChina
- TORUGermany
Year First Available
- EMMA K—
- TORU2016
Verified Deployments
- EMMA K0 Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- EMMA KContact for quote
- TORU$63,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EMMA K8 hrs
- TORU9 hrs
Availability Status
- EMMA KACTIVE
- TORUACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EMMA K400 kg
- TORU95 kg
AMR Subtype
- EMMA Kpallet mover
- TORUother
Length
- EMMA K824 mm
- TORU102.4 mm
Width
- EMMA K533 mm
- TORU66.9 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EMMA Klidar slam,visual slam,hybrid slam
- TORUother
Localization Accuracy
- EMMA K30 mm
- TORU—
Docking Repeatability
- EMMA K2 mm
- TORU—
Pedestrian Detection
- EMMA KYes
- TORU—
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- EMMA K1.2 m/s
- TORU—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- EMMA K1.5 m/s
- TORU—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EMMA Klifepo4
- TORUother
Battery Capacity
- EMMA K1.3 kWh
- TORU—
Charging Time
- EMMA K1.5 hrs
- TORU—
Auto Docking
- EMMA KYes
- TORU—
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EMMA K360 °
- TORU—
Connectivity
API Type
- EMMA Kopen rest
- TORU—
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- EMMA KYes
- TORU—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- EMMA KContact for quote
- TORU$63,000 USD
Warranty
- EMMA K—
- TORU1 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $63,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 400 kg | 95 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | pallet mover | other |
| Length (values differ) | 824 mm | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | 533 mm | 66.9 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,visual slam,hybrid slam | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 30 mm | — |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 2 mm | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | lifepo4 | other |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.3 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $63,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EMMA K | TORU |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $63,000 |
| Payback period | — | 15.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $187,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +297% |
EMMA K has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EMMA K and TORU?
EMMA K is made by IPLUSMOBOT, based in CN. TORU is made by Magazino, based in DE.
How do EMMA K and TORU compare on the Robo Score?
EMMA K scores 50.8 on the Robo Score. TORU scores 73.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EMMA K and TORU in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EMMA K and TORU?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EMMA K vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.