EMMA K vs MiR500
Side-by-side comparison of EMMA K (IPLUSMOBOT) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EMMA KChina
- MiR500Denmark
Year First Available
- EMMA K—
- MiR5002018
Verified Deployments
- EMMA K0 Deployments
- MiR5000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EMMA K8 hrs
- MiR50017.5 hrs
Availability Status
- EMMA KACTIVE
- MiR500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EMMA K400 kg
- MiR500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- EMMA Kpallet mover
- MiR500unit load carrier
Length
- EMMA K824 mm
- MiR500800 mm
Width
- EMMA K533 mm
- MiR500580 mm
Min Aisle Width
- EMMA K—
- MiR500850 mm
Ground Clearance
- EMMA K—
- MiR50025 mm
Robot Weight
- EMMA K—
- MiR50094 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EMMA Klidar slam,visual slam,hybrid slam
- MiR500other
Localization Accuracy
- EMMA K30 mm
- MiR50060 mm
Docking Repeatability
- EMMA K2 mm
- MiR5003 mm
Obstacle Detection Range
- EMMA K—
- MiR5001.2 m
Min Object Detection Height
- EMMA K—
- MiR5009.8 cm
Pedestrian Detection
- EMMA KYes
- MiR500Yes
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- EMMA K1.2 m/s
- MiR500—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- EMMA K1.5 m/s
- MiR500—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EMMA Klifepo4
- MiR500li ion
Battery Capacity
- EMMA K1.3 kWh
- MiR500—
Runtime (Loaded)
- EMMA K—
- MiR50013 hrs
Charging Time
- EMMA K1.5 hrs
- MiR500—
Opportunity Charging
- EMMA K—
- MiR500Yes
Auto Docking
- EMMA KYes
- MiR500Yes
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- EMMA K—
- MiR5003000
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- EMMA K—
- MiR500Yes
R15.08 Certified
- EMMA K—
- MiR500Yes
Emergency Stops
- EMMA K—
- MiR5001
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EMMA K360 °
- MiR500360 °
Connectivity
API Type
- EMMA Kopen rest
- MiR500—
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- EMMA KYes
- MiR500—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 400 kg | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | pallet mover | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 824 mm | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | 533 mm | 580 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,visual slam,hybrid slam | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 30 mm | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 2 mm | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | lifepo4 | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.3 kWh | — |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking | Yes | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage | 360 ° | 360 ° |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | Yes | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Turning Radius, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Swap, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EMMA K | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EMMA K, MiR500 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EMMA K and MiR500?
EMMA K is made by IPLUSMOBOT, based in CN. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do EMMA K and MiR500 compare on the Robo Score?
EMMA K scores 50.8 on the Robo Score. MiR500 scores 73.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EMMA K and MiR500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EMMA K and MiR500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EMMA K vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.