EVO Lite Enterprise vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of EVO Lite Enterprise (Autel Robotics) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EVO Lite EnterpriseChina
- TORUGermany

Year First Available
- EVO Lite Enterprise—
- TORU2016

Verified Deployments
- EVO Lite Enterprise0 Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- EVO Lite Enterprise$1,579–$4,239 USD
- TORU$63,000 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime
- EVO Lite Enterprise—
- TORU9 hrs

Availability Status
- EVO Lite EnterpriseACTIVE
- TORUACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EVO Lite Enterprise—
- TORU95 kg

AMR Subtype
- EVO Lite Enterpriseother
- TORUother

Length
- EVO Lite Enterprise—
- TORU102.4 mm

Width
- EVO Lite Enterprise—
- TORU66.9 mm

Robot Weight
- EVO Lite Enterprise0.9 kg
- TORU—

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EVO Lite Enterpriseother
- TORUother

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EVO Lite Enterpriseli ion
- TORUother

Commercial
Price (USD)
- EVO Lite Enterprise$1,579–$4,239 USD
- TORU$63,000 USD

Warranty
- EVO Lite Enterprise—
- TORU1 yrs

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $1,579–$4,239 USD | $63,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 95 kg |
| AMR Subtype | other | other |
| Length (values differ) | — | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 66.9 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 0.9 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | other | other |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | other |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $1,579–$4,239 USD | $63,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EVO Lite Enterprise | TORU |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $2,909 | $63,000 |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | 15.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $247,091 | $187,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +8494% | +297% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EVO Lite Enterprise and TORU?
EVO Lite Enterprise is made by Autel Robotics, based in CN. TORU is made by Magazino, based in DE.
How do EVO Lite Enterprise and TORU compare on the Robo Index?
EVO Lite Enterprise grades A on the Robo Index. TORU grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EVO Lite Enterprise and TORU in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EVO Lite Enterprise and TORU?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EVO Lite Enterprise vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.